NOTE: I will be posting the majority of this series..and many others, on https://www.ministryaiandi.com
‘
MINISTRY AI AND I
PART 2 TROUBLING THE CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY**
** this Part 2 may really do it!
CONTROL AND AUTHORITY, APOSTLE PAUL
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under copyright laws, in conjunction with AI
Taveau ASKS Chat GPT AI about Legalism in Christian Ministry Governing Authority, More, as it surely fits in with the subject of Western European Levitical Patriarchian, the hot topic of “prophets, apostles” and “pentecost” of which I am one.
First question:
TD Asks Chat GPT AI:
Would First Church History or Bible teaching, practices, classify Christ, any of the First Church apostles, Apostle Paul as “authoritarian, overbearing or fascist?”
Chat GPT responds
No, Christ and the First Church apostles, including Paul, cannot be classified as authoritarian, overbearing, or fascist. Their leadership was based on love, humility, servanthood, and freedom in Christ, which fundamentally contradicts the traits of authoritarianism or control. Here’s how their leadership was characterized:
1. Christ’s Leadership Model
Matthew 20:25-28 (KJV):
“But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.”
- Jesus explicitly rejected the top-down, controlling leadership style of worldly rulers. Instead, He taught servant leadership, where greatness was measured by humility and service.
- Jesus’ actions—washing His disciples’ feet (John 13:12-17) and willingly laying down His life—demonstrated this servant leadership in practice.
2. The First Church Apostles’ Leadership Model
The apostles continued to follow Christ’s servant-leadership model, emphasizing freedom, mutual submission, and humility.
-
1 Peter 5:2-3 (KJV):
“Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind;
Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock.”Peter taught that leaders should shepherd God’s people willingly and humbly, not by exercising harsh authority or domination.
-
Acts 15 (The Jerusalem Council):
When addressing church disputes, the apostles did not impose decisions dictatorially but sought the Holy Spirit’s guidance and consensus among the brethren.
3. Paul’s Leadership Style
Paul’s letters reflect a consistent pattern of humility and servant leadership:
-
2 Corinthians 1:24 (KJV):
“Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand.”
Paul rejected any notion of controlling the faith of believers. Instead, he viewed himself as a helper, encouraging believers to stand in faith. -
Galatians 5:1 (KJV):
“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”
Paul emphasized the freedom believers have in Christ and warned against falling under any form of religious or authoritarian bondage. -
Ephesians 5:21 (KJV):
“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
Paul encouraged mutual submission, emphasizing humility and love rather than rigid authority.
Contrasting with Authoritarianism and Fascism
- Authoritarianism: Involves top-down control, coercion, and suppression of dissent. Christ and the apostles promoted freedom, humility, and service.
- Fascism: Often involves extreme nationalism, uniformity, and dehumanization. Christ’s ministry was inclusive, loving, and open to all people, emphasizing dignity and mutual respect.
Conclusion
Christ and the First Church apostles operated with servant leadership, humility, and love. They rejected authoritarian control and promoted freedom and mutual respect. Therefore, labeling them as authoritarian, overbearing, or fascist would be a complete mischaracterization of their teachings and actions. Their leadership style provides a timeless example of how spiritual authority should be exercised—with grace, compassion, and service to others.
Taveau Asks About Church, Ministry Governing AUTHORITY:
ChatGPT answered:
1. Authority in the First Church: Was There One Person or Group Over the Entire Church
No single person or group held ultimate authority over the entire First Church after Jesus ascended to heaven. The First Church was decentralized and led by a combination of apostles, elders, and local leaders, all under the headship of Jesus Christ alone. This structure is explicitly described in the New Testament:
-
Christ as Head of the Church:
- Ephesians 1:22-23 (NIV): “And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body.”
- Colossians 1:18: “And he is the head of the body, the church…”
-
Apostolic Leadership: The original apostles, particularly Peter, James (the brother of Jesus), and Paul, played key roles in preaching the gospel, planting churches, and clarifying doctrine. However, there is no evidence of any one apostle exercising absolute authority over all believers:
- Acts 15: The Jerusalem Council demonstrates that church leadership was a collaborative effort, with multiple apostles and elders (including Peter and James) discussing and discerning major decisions together.
-
Local Autonomy:
Local churches had appointed elders (Greek: “presbuteroi,” meaning older or spiritually mature leaders) to shepherd and guide congregations (Acts 14:23, Titus 1:5). Elders worked under the authority of Christ, not a hierarchical bishop or “apostolic covering” system.
In summary:
There was no formalized hierarchy or “pope-like” figure in the First Church. Instead, there was mutual submission under Christ’s leadership and collaborative decision-making.
Conclusion:
We find no records of a Centralized Authority in the First Church: The First Church was led by collaborative leadership, with no singular apostolic figure or “covering” system.
Taveau Asks About First Church Servant Leader Model VS Authoritarian
TD Asks
Was the entire Christian community (elders, offices, leader, lay, marriages “all servant leader Ephesian 5:21 “mutually submitting in the fear of the Lord” (no big I’s, little you’s)
Also, when did more “authoritarian” “control” enter the First Church?
Chat GPT AI replies:
APOSTOLIC NOTE HERE:
1. The First Church: Was Everyone a “Servant Leader” Under Ephesians 5:21?
Yes, the early Christian community emphasized mutual submission and servant leadership, based on the teachings of Jesus and the apostles. Ephesians 5:21 was foundational to the First Church’s relational dynamics
-
Ephesians 5:21 (KJV): “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
This verse sets the tone for all Christian relationships, including marriage, leadership, and church life. The word for “submit” (Greek: hupotassō) implies voluntary cooperation and mutual humility rather than control or dominance. - TAVEAU’S APOSTOLIC NOTE ..TD ADDS:
- Please try to picture the Old TV rerun ANDY OF MAYBERRY Watch how Sheriff Andy Taylor acts, reacts with his Aunt Bea, his son, Opie, Deputy Barney Fife, all of the others, Then we act like him, them. He regards each one worthy of his Equal Opportunity REAL respect. This is Cross Body Unity Perspective, also.
-
Jesus’ Model of Leadership:
- Jesus explicitly taught servant leadership:
- Matthew 20:25-28 (NIV): “Whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave—just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
- Jesus demonstrated this by washing His disciples’ feet (John 13:12-17), a powerful act of humility that embodied His view of leadership.
- Jesus explicitly taught servant leadership:
-
Apostolic Teaching:
- Peter urged leaders to serve willingly, not as overlords:
- 1 Peter 5:2-3: “Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them—not because you must, but because you are willing… not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock.”
- Peter urged leaders to serve willingly, not as overlords:
-
Church Offices: The roles of apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers (Ephesians 4:11-12) were meant to equip the saints and build up the body of Christ, not to control or dominate others.
Thus, in the First Church, leadership was defined by service, humility, and mutual submission, aligning with the example of Christ.
Taveau requests of Chat GPT AI:
For the Record, please define Christian authoritarianism, overbearing, fascism
ChatGPT wisely responds:
The terms “Christian authoritarian,” “overbearing,” and “fascism” are used to describe leadership or church practices that deviate from the biblical model of servant leadership. Here’s how each term could be defined in a Christian context:
1. Christian Authoritarianism
Christian authoritarianism refers to leadership or church governance that exercises strict control over members, often prioritizing obedience to leaders over individual spiritual freedom. It typically involves:
- Top-Down Control: Leaders demand submission without mutual accountability or space for questioning.
- Legalism: Strict adherence to rules, often beyond what is taught in Scripture, to maintain control over behavior.
- Manipulation or Coercion: Members may be threatened with spiritual consequences (e.g., being labeled as “rebellious” or “out of God’s will”) if they question authority.
- Scriptural Distortion: Certain scriptures (e.g., “submit to authority” or “touch not God’s anointed”) are misused to enforce compliance.
Biblical Contrast: Jesus taught that leaders should be servants (Matthew 20:25-28), not rulers who dominate or coerce.
2. Overbearing Christian Leadership
Overbearing leadership is characterized by excessive forcefulness, rigidity, and the suppression of individuality in the name of faith or doctrine. It often includes:
- Micro-Management: Leaders dictate every aspect of a believer’s life, including personal decisions.
- Judgmentalism: Harsh judgment or condemnation of those who do not conform to a particular image or lifestyle.
- Guilt and Shame: Constant emphasis on sin and failure to instill fear, guilt, or a sense of unworthiness.
- Lack of Compassion: Little to no empathy for life circumstances, focusing only on enforcing rules.
Biblical Contrast: Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 1:24 (KJV), “Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy.” True Christian leaders encourage joy and faith, not fear and control.
3. Christian Fascism
Though rare, the term “Christian fascism” is used by critics to describe movements that combine political power with religious rhetoric to enforce conformity. It typically involves:
- Extreme Nationalism: Merging national identity with religious identity to the point where dissent is viewed as unpatriotic or heretical.
- Uniformity and Suppression: Silencing opposing viewpoints within the church or society in the name of preserving “Christian values.”
- Control Through Fear: Using fear (of hell, outsiders, or divine punishment) to justify oppressive policies.
- Idolatry of Leadership: Leaders may be elevated to a nearly divine status, demanding unquestioning loyalty.
Biblical Contrast: Jesus preached love, humility, and inclusivity, not exclusion or fear-driven conformity. He warned against hypocrisy and power-seeking religious leaders (Matthew 23).
Summary
- Christian Authoritarianism: Controlling church leadership that demands blind obedience.
- Overbearing Leadership: Heavy-handed, judgmental leadership that stifles joy and spiritual freedom.
- Christian Fascism: A distortion that blends political and religious authoritarianism, often silencing dissent.
All of these models are inconsistent with Christ’s teachings on servant leadership, humility, and love. Instead, the New Testament promotes freedom in Christ, mutual submission, and servant-hearted
Sister Taveau’s asks specifically about Apostle Paul:
How did the Apostle Paul role model portray First Church Simple authority? “Follow me only as I follow Christ, etc…include Philippians 2:12, Ephesians 4: 1-4, Ephesians 5:21 any other also any other First Church apostle comments.
ChatGPT replies:
The Apostle Paul’s teachings and example in the New Testament emphasize servant leadership, humility, and submission to Christ rather than authoritarian control. Below is a look at how Paul modeled and instructed First Church simple authority using his writings, including Philippians 2:12, Ephesians 4:1-4, and Ephesians 5:21, along with other relevant passages.
1. “Follow me as I follow Christ” (1 Corinthians 11:1, KJV)
“Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.”
APOSTOLIC TRAINING NOTE:
Paul did not demand unquestioning loyalty to himself but instead pointed others to follow his example only insofar as he followed Christ. His leadership was Christ-centered, with an emphasis on personal relationship with God, humility, and obedience to Jesus’ teachings.
2. Philippians 2:12 (KJV)
“Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.”
Paul encouraged believers to take personal responsibility for their spiritual growth. Rather than setting up rigid control or dependence on human authority, Paul promoted self-leadership under the Lordship of Christ. He empowered believers to seek God directly and grow in holiness
3. Ephesians 4:1-4 (KJV)
“I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love;
Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling.”
Here Paul teaches leadership through humility, meekness, and patience, emphasizing unity in the Spirit rather than division or control. His leadership style promoted mutual respect, love, and peace among the early believers.
4. Ephesians 5:21 (KJV)
“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
This verse reflects Paul’s view of mutual submission in the Body of Christ. Authority was not about lording power over others but about serving one another in love and reverence for God. The First Church modeled shared accountability and servant leadership, not hierarchical control.
5. Galatians 5:13-14 (KJV)
“For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.”
Paul emphasized freedom in Christ, tempered by loving service to others. First Church authority was rooted in love and service, not domination
6. 2 Corinthians 1:24 (KJV)
“Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand.”
Paul clarifies that he did not view his role as one of ruling over the faith of believers but as a helper to encourage their joy and faith in Christ.
7. Romans 12:10 (KJV)
“Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another.”
Paul instructed believers to honor and prefer each other in love, emphasizing mutual respect and humility over authoritarianism.
Summary
Paul’s portrayal of simple First Church authority was based on:
- Following Christ as the central leader.
- Servant leadership and humility.
- Encouragement of personal responsibility for spiritual growth.
- Mutual submission and love within the Body of Christ.
This model stands in contrast to authoritarian or controlling leadership styles, promoting instead unity, peace, and shared accountability in Christ.
A GALATIANS 1:1-2 SR PASTOR, APOSTLE HOLY SPIRIT OPTION** Taveau explains this surprising, apparently fully unknown, never heard of , yet mega apostolic perspective
** Note. I, Miss T, Taveau D’Arcy did not “fashion myself into this to DO THIS.” Neither did this she person dream it up, nor “join” or ‘think I was going to work hard to transform myself to DO THIS” Therefore, do not “sign on” become any or all of this “unless” YOU are SENT to be THIS ..the GALATIANS 1:1-2 NON BIASED CROSS BODY prophetic TYPE ongoing apostolic sr ministry was ‘downloaded, revealed, questioned, Bible validated and after milling, sifting, prison like enduring situations, times spent in prayer (many many years) then THE LORD OPENED MY EYES TO THIS AND TO MY SELF. (NOT MY CHOICE ….BUT HIS!!)
And LIKE A PAUL you must either be “called” and later on”FASHIONED” INTO IT …or else NOT. For apostolic office “this” a Galatians 1:1-2 MUST BE GOD COMMISSIONED…meaning even over MANY YEARS… not weeks.not fast fix, instant or quick..rather it’s done in the real life PROCESS, at God’s peculiar leading, methods, timings. It comes with much repeated fires, extreme situations, sifting, many imperfections, gaining deep understanding and individual forms of “fasting” and despite many near death depleting unkind shipwrecks.
“Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)
And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia.”
Also, please factor in Paul as a Galatians 1:1-2 authority “not under anyone”for it is a accusing legalism out there in the mainly “squire” dysfunctional leaders. I liked when Paul was not wanted by the first Church original apostles who were hand mentored by Christ (at first) …and while he arising to fulfill the “second Christian generation” sr ministry he rejected yet was was secure in the Lord to go after his “never before known” Galatians 1:1-2 pioneering ministry apostolic call. I call that Niche Sr office “I did not confer with flesh and blood “(due to the role model of Apostle Paul for now “nobody in the top 12 Chief Apostles were able to accurately “Get Paul” that means even while they met for 2 weeks (Apostle Paul, Barnabas and Peter) they still did not “assess, perceive and discerned correctly; I like that on behalf of every rising “new unknown non famous Christian leader move”It’s par for the”inventors” turf.
The Apostle Paul’s portrayal of First Church simple authority was grounded in his personal calling by Jesus Christ, independent of human approval or hierarchical systems. His model emphasized servant leadership, humility, mutual submission, and following Christ as the central authority. Below is an expanded breakdown of how Paul’s teachings and role exemplified simple First Church authority, incorporating key passages from Galatians and other scriptures.
1. Galatians 1:1-2 (KJV)
“Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)
And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia.”
Paul begins by emphasizing that his authority as an apostle was not bestowed by men or any church institution but directly from Jesus Christ. This was a cornerstone of his ministry—his confidence came from his God-given calling, not human validation.
This ties into First Church simple authority by showing that Paul operated with a Christ-centered, Spirit-led model rather than depending on human hierarchies or approval. His ministry was secure because it was based solely on his obedience to Christ.
2. Galatians 1:15-17 (KJV)
“But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace,
To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:
Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.”
Here Paul emphasizes that after his calling, he did not seek validation or approval from the original apostles (those who had been hand-mentored by Christ). His independence did not reflect arrogance but a deep understanding of his calling and a commitment to following Christ above all else.
This further reinforces First Church authority as one that comes from a personal relationship with Christ, not control by human leaders. Paul’s secure stance provides a model for modern ministry—servant leaders who rely on God’s guidance without being swayed by human politics or traditions.
3. 1 Corinthians 11:1 (KJV)
“Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.”
Paul’s invitation to follow him only as he followed Christ reflects his servant-leader approach. His authority was not about creating personal followers but about pointing everyone to Jesus as the ultimate authority.
4. Philippians 2:12 (KJV)
“Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.”
Paul encouraged believers to take personal responsibility for their faith. First Church authority, in Paul’s model, did not involve micro-management or authoritarian oversight. Instead, it promoted spiritual maturity and direct accountability to God.
5. Ephesians 4:1-4 (KJV)
“I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love;
Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.
There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling.”
Paul’s leadership model emphasized humility, patience, and love within the Body of Christ. He portrayed authority not as a tool for control but as a means to promote unity and peace in the church.
6. Ephesians 5:21 (KJV)
“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
Paul taught mutual submission rather than hierarchical control. True authority in the First Church was based on mutual respect, love, and servanthood. Even apostles and leaders were expected to submit to one another in reverence for Christ.
7. 2 Corinthians 1:24 (KJV)
“Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand.”
Paul clarified that he did not see himself as a ruler over others’ faith. Instead, his role was to help believers experience the joy and freedom of faith in Christ. This underscores Paul’s model of authority as one of encouragement, not domination.
8. Romans 12:10 (KJV)
“Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another.”
Paul encouraged believers to honor and prefer one another in love. This reflected his emphasis on humility and servant leadership, which were core to First Church authority.
Summary
Paul’s role model for First Church simple authority emphasized the following principles:
- Authority from Christ alone: Paul’s authority came from his personal calling by Jesus, not human appointment (Galatians 1:1-2).
- Independence with humility: Paul did not seek approval from the original apostles but operated securely in his calling (Galatians 1:15-17).
- Christ-centered leadership: He directed others to follow him only as he followed Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1).
- Servant leadership: Authority was expressed through humility, patience, mutual submission, and love (Ephesians 4:1-4, 5:21).
- Encouragement over control: Paul’s goal was to help others stand in faith and grow spiritually (2 Corinthians 1:24).
This model serves as a timeless example of Christ-centered leadership and simple authority rooted in love, humility, and submission to Christ rather than human control or institutional hierarchy
*Taveau can teach a lot more in depth on this, due to all of the legalism and ministry control out there, but I wanted to ask ChatGPT AI to be “objective” and not ME, a FEMALE putting this out there. I will talk later on this but not here.
Taveau asks Chat GPT WHY Paul would “not be sent out by any one person or any one group” (She realizes her own revelation on this matter, but wishes to hear the ChatGPT AI for objectivity, then she will add her own beliefs (given via Holy Spirit revelation) at the end of this part.
ChatGPT responds;
Apostle Paul’s calling to “not be sent out by any one person or group” (as stated in Galatians 1:1-2) is significant for several reasons. This divine calling highlights key themes in Paul’s ministry and teachings, as well as broader principles for the First Church. Here’s why this distinction is crucial:
1. Direct Authority from Christ
Paul emphasizes that his apostleship comes “not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father” (Galatians 1:1 KJV). This indicates:
- No Human Intermediary: Paul did not receive his commissioning from human leaders or institutions, unlike the other apostles who were directly discipled by Jesus during His earthly ministry.
- Validation of His Mission: Paul’s ministry to the Gentiles required legitimacy beyond human approval. By making it clear that he was sent directly by Christ, Paul ensured that his authority was grounded in divine, not human, endorsement.
- Freedom from Man’s Influence: Paul was free from political, social, or religious pressures that could influence or control his teaching. His loyalty was solely to Christ, which allowed him to speak boldly and confront error (e.g., his rebuke of Peter in Galatians 2:11-14).
2. Avoiding Human Institutionalism or Partiality
The early church was still forming its leadership structure, and many Jewish believers struggled with incorporating Gentiles into the faith without imposing the Mosaic Law. Paul’s call was:
- Independent of Human Structures: Paul did not need approval from the Jerusalem apostles to begin his ministry. This independence protected his mission from being limited by cultural or legalistic biases.
- Equal Apostolic Authority: By highlighting that he was sent by Christ, Paul established that his ministry was just as valid as those of Peter, James, and John, even though he did not walk with Christ during His earthly ministry.
3. Upholding the Gospel of Grace
Paul was uniquely positioned to champion the gospel of grace (as seen throughout Galatians). His independence from human commissioning protected the purity of his message:
- No Compromise: Paul’s gospel was rooted in the revelation of Christ and not subject to human negotiation or dilution. He fought against adding legalistic requirements to salvation (Galatians 2:16).
- Freedom from Religious Elitism: Paul rejected the idea that salvation could be mediated by human authorities, traditions, or religious rituals. His calling emphasized direct relationship with Christ for all believers.
4. Affirming the Role of Divine Calling in Leadership
Paul’s experience set a precedent for leadership in the Church:
- God’s Sovereignty in Ministry: Ministry calling and authority come from God, not from human ordination alone.
- Inclusion of the “Outsider”: Paul was an outsider in terms of the original apostles, but God used him powerfully. This demonstrates that God can call anyone, regardless of background or association with a specific group.
- Personal Responsibility to Obey: Since Paul’s calling came from God alone, his responsibility was to obey God directly rather than seek validation from human leaders.
5. Paul’s Defense of His Calling (Galatians 1:10-12)
Paul explains the significance of his divine calling further in Galatians 1:10-12 (KJV):
“For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.”
This passage reinforces Paul’s independence from human approval and highlights the divine origin of his message and apostleship.
Conclusion
Paul’s calling to be “not sent out by any one person or group” was essential for preserving the integrity of his ministry and the gospel message. It ensured that his authority rested solely in Christ, freed him from human biases and control, and empowered him to boldly preach the gospel of grace to the Gentiles. This independence also modeled the importance of divine calling over institutional approval in Christian leadership—a principle that still holds relevance today.
Apstolic Taveau’s Own Views on WHY Apostle Paul made it plain that he was “not sent out by” (meaning UNDER) the authority of “any one minister” “5 fold ministry office” or ministry doctrinal and authority/governing, presbytery or group style.
And after what I have encountered also survived, mainly if not ONLY in the American shepherding false Pharisee, whining elite group subculture (mainly if not only the “Patrician WELP” which have hangers on of the consistent, predatory and very fraudulent, bearing false witness also “regal authoritarian, turf owning practitioners.. now named WANNABES I agree whole heartedly with this Pauline Galatians 1:1-2 .. due to my huge life experience the mainly this big attacking unrepentant micro and mega group.
1. Chief Apostle Paul needed the freedom to (Philippians 2:12) “hear God for himself ” due to the major, depth, height, width of his eternal also deeply complex call. He knew the Lord for himself and heard by the power of the Holy Spirit all of the in’s and out’s of his giant (Future Church) revelatory and mega call. Thus, how could any “oversight” no matter how wise, mature “deeply know, understand WHAT PAUL knew, understood or could handle, stand, endure!
2. He did not want to be, could not AFFORD TO BE controlled, minimized, Big Bossed, micromanaged, censored, or possibly BOUGHT (for the sober call,his timeless apostolic/ Eternal Messages)by the many seductive, powerful, attractive, pleasing yet often manipulative ambitious throngs. Mos of whom would want to “own him” to control him, to micromanage him, to subtly target him, to play him, to pressure him to “use” his GIANT GIFT for their own material gains. (like it is precisely now!)
TWO QUESTIONS the shepherding, covering, Big Boss ministers want to have answered”
What about apostle Paul’s view of “covering?”
Dr Taveau D’Arcy answers “the only verse that mentions any type of ‘”covering” in the New Testament “is God’s love covers a multitude of sins” It does mention Ephesians 5:21 “chain of command” which this ministry is ‘under.’
I teach and submit that the “covering word’ should be replaced with “God Chosen and SENT Accountability Persons”..(“holding persons accountable”lightly, not authoritarian, but smart family feel SENT TRUE ONES.) However, in most ministers they are not enough “Worthy” “or “True” or TRUSTWORTHY and/o “PURE MOTIVED” also ” DEEP “enough (at present) to risk it. (my own findings,but have tiny few… need more of these)
Dr T would also submit that there is always a “need” for more mature PRAYER COVERING (“watch your back in PRAYER and cover you in prayer) which I do for ministers. Today it appears that this is the WORST NIGHTMARE for “the ability to trust” seeming like “predatory” “opportunist” even sly GME.(large USA grass roots mainly media afflicted, Show Biz Wannabe)
GIME
(pronounced GIMMEY)
“GREED, IGNORANCE, MATERIALISM, EGO”
NOTE : Apostle Taveau is the off scouring dung to the Christian Celebrity Media Ministry and she fine with all of this. Her Call Galatians 1:1-2, Acts 17:17 and servant Leader “submitted to all in Ephesians 5:21″ first church. She believes in Ephesians 5:21 with 5:22 should the Lord SEND her a Christian husband. However, she is not looking, and will Father God send or NOT send. Too ” I Timothy 6:6, “Godly contented” and stays super busy. Should the Lord tarry and abiding in His deep grace, in 2026 Sister Taveau will celebrate 50 years of “surfing and analyzing and study the Body of Christian leader doctrines, which are much affected by the Media. ” Now she is content to remain in her own realm and lets all others come to HER by “divine appointment ONLY”.
Qs? crossbodyunity@gmail.com
AUTHORITARIANISM COMES IN TO WIELD TOP CONTROL
Dr Taveau Asks Chat GPT
“When did “Authoritarians” and controllers enter into the Ephesians 5:21 “mutually submitted” and servant leaders Church/ministry fellowships?
Chat GPT responded:
When Did Authoritarianism Enter the Church?
Authoritarianism began to creep into the Church gradually, starting in the late 1st and early 2nd centuries as the Church expanded and faced both internal and external pressures. Several key factors contributed to this shift
A. Cultural Influences from Roman and Greek Society
-
Roman Hierarchical Structure:
The Roman Empire was structured with a strict hierarchy—from Caesar down to local governors and soldiers. As Christianity spread through the Roman world, the Church began to adopt similar hierarchical patterns. -
Patriarchal Norms:
Roman and Greek cultures were deeply patriarchal, with women and lower-class individuals expected to submit to male authority. Some leaders in the early church began to reinterpret Paul’s teachings on submission through a cultural lens, rather than Christ’s model of equality and “mutual submission.”
B. The Development of the Episcopal Model (2nd-3rd Century)
- By the 2nd century, the role of bishop began to evolve from a local elder or overseer to a central figure with more authority over multiple congregations.
- Ignatius of Antioch (c. 110 AD) wrote letters emphasizing the authority of bishops, urging Christians to submit to their bishops as they would to Christ. This marked a shift from collaborative leadership to a more centralized authority.
- Over time, bishops began to consolidate power, especially in major cities like Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch.
C. Response to Heresies and Persecution
- Combatting False Teachings:
The early church faced numerous heresies (e.g., Gnosticism and Marcionism), which led church leaders to assert more control to protect doctrinal purity. - Persecutions:
Roman persecution also led to a need for strong, centralized leadership to organize the underground church and protect the community. However, this centralization often evolved into authoritarianism over time
D. The Rise of Constantine and State-Church Fusion (4th Century)
-
In 313 AD, Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, legalizing Christianity and ending persecution. However, Constantine also sought to unify the empire through religion, using Christianity as a tool of political control.
-
Council of Nicaea (325 AD): The first ecumenical council was convened by Constantine to settle theological disputes (e.g., Arianism). This event symbolized the growing union of church and state, leading to the Church adopting more hierarchical, authoritarian structures similar to the Roman government.
-
Bishop of Rome’s Growing Authority: Over time, the bishop of Rome (later known as the Pope) began to assert authority over the entire Western Church, laying the groundwork for the centralized authority of the Roman Catholic Church.
E. Gender and “Covering” Doctrine
-
As hierarchical structures solidified, women’s roles were increasingly restricted.
- By the 4th century, the Church began to institutionalize male dominance, interpreting Paul’s writings (e.g., 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 1 Timothy 2:12) as universal bans on female leadership.
- The concept of women needing to be “covered” or “under” male authority became more prevalent, despite the lack of biblical support for such a doctrine.
-
This shift contradicted the early examples of women leaders (e.g., Phoebe, Priscilla, Junia) in the First Church and Jesus’ radical inclusion of women in His ministry.
3. Protestantism and the Reaction to Authoritarianism (16th Century)
By the 16th century, many Christians became disillusioned with the authoritarian control of the Catholic Church, especially practices like:
- Papal infallibility: The Pope claimed ultimate authority over all believers.
- Clerical control: The laity had little access to the Bible and were dependent on priests for spiritual guidance.
The Protestant Reformation (1517): Led by figures like Martin Luther, the Reformation sought to return to biblical authority and the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). While Protestantism rejected many authoritarian practices, some authoritarian tendencies (e.g., patriarchal structures and denominational control) persisted in various Protestant traditions.
Conclusion: From Servant Leadership to Authoritarianism
- The First Church operated under a model of “mutual submission” (Ephesians 5:21) and servant leadership, with Jesus Christ as the head of the Church. Leadership roles were meant to equip and serve the Body of Christ, not to dominate or control.
- Authoritarianism entered the Church gradually, influenced by:
- Roman and Greek hierarchical culture
- Centralization of bishop authority
- State involvement in church affairs
- Doctrinal battles and persecution
- Patriarchal reinterpretations of scripture
- Despite these shifts, the biblical model of leadership remains one of humility, service, and equality in Christ, as seen in the teachings of Jesus, Paul, and the First Church
We conclude for today..
Next article..will include APOSTLE PAUL AND THE LEADER WOMEN (say “Uh oh!! and O BOY!)
TO SUPPORT:
Please pray and cover this dear person with mature prayers. Sincere, thanks!
GIVE?
See the GIVE LINK at the top ever of every home page. Thanks!
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI